Bad Effects Of Transhumanism Essay

Humans (and trans homophiles) ar marked by a persistent desire to understand and go out their environment and experience. Before the culture of the scientific method, deductive and inductive logic, game theory, sophisticated epistemic principles and so on, humans resorted to superficial causal explanations based on observation for common phenomena, and theist explanation for fantastic levelts. Deities were invoked to explain unusual or destructive phenomena, and to turn up to provide a comforting model of the uncertainties and rebellious events in liveliness. Storms, floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, epidemics and madness could not be tolerated without nigh belief about their cause. In the absence of scientific explanation a sacred or theistic explanation was almost inevit fitted. Along with pre-scientific attempts at discretion came a crude attempt at a technology. A tension is evident here On the one hand theologys have frequently say events to be determined by a inspir ed plan and so have held attempts at ever-changing things to be futile (this is common in eastern moralitys, as well as other religions involving predestination).On the other hand, religions have offered certain limited and guardedly circumscribed means of changing and controlling events, such(prenominal) as through prayer, ritual, and magic. The oer wholly result has been entropic and anti-progressive since religious technology is ineffective (with the occasional exception of neurotic effects). The role of religion in providing explanations, however poor, of human life and its environment has given way over time to the superior resources of empirical science. Science has been able to explain an enormous variety of phenomena, both shopworn and unusual. Protestations by theists that science has not and cannot explain the blood of life, the origin of the universe, or the nature of cognisance argon increasingly ridiculous as we continue to break and discover. An objection to th is view of the origin and strength of religion is that it is unclear why religion is persisting and even growing as scientific triumphs abound.This objection makes ii mistakes however. First, as I am showing, there argon other sustaining causes of religion that do not all or closely depend on the development of science. Second, the apparent strength and resurgence of religion is, I believe, an illusiongenerated from a limited perspective. Certainly religion is not declining rapidly, and is continually taking new forms (such as New Age mysticism), but seen over a span of decades and centuries the trend is clear enough. Late 20th century religion is very much little powerful than religion in the Middle Ages. In the past religion dominated all aspects of life and the idea of a separation of Church and carry would have been considered incomprehensible and wicked.DEALING WITH DEATH AND disbelief One of the great tasks before us, as transhumanists, is the reengineering of our consci ousness to do away with the powerful desire for sure thing of a principletic kind. Most humans facial expression that they cannot bear to be wrong. They fear an unknown future. They pronto give up intellectual and emotion liberty in favor of faith in some other person, whether human or supernatural myth. Humans are also driven to the comforts of religious dogma by the terrible fact of death.Some transhumanists reside religion to automatically decline as scientific progress accelerates. Unfortunately, the faster technology and society changes, the greater the uncertainty in peoples lives, so the greater the appeal of religion in all its forms. (Hence the takeover by National Socialism and collectivism at times of great upheaval.) Scientific and technological progress alone lead not nullify religious thinking. Transhumanist philosophies, especially immortalist philosophies such as Extropianism, will be vital to intellectual and emotional progress.